Search for: "W. V." Results 1 - 20 of 22,032
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2009, 1:42 am
C v W [2008] EWCA Civ 1459; WLR (D) 4 “There was nothing unreasonable in a simple conditional fee agreement entered into between a claimant and her solicitor when liability had already been admitted by the defendant in the proceedings provided that the parties had made a proper assessment of the inevitably much reduced risk of [...] [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 3:05 am by sally
Regina v W Court of Appeal, Criminal Division “Whether a defendant was acting dishonestly was a matter for the jury after a correct direction from the trial judge. [read post]
20 May 2010, 3:20 am by sally
Regina v W and others [2010] EWCA Crim 927; [2010] WLR (D) 125 “Where a person was accused of permitting the deposit, disposing or keeping of controlled waste, contrary to s 33 of the Control of Pollution Act 1990, the question whether the material in question amounted to ‘waste’, and if so, ‘controlled waste’, was a question of fact for the jury, as was the question of whether material which was originally waste had been acceptably recovered or… [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 3:58 am by tracey
W v M and others [2011] EWHC 2443 (Fam);  [2011] WLR (D)  283 “Pursuant to section 4 of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 it was not in the best interests of a patient diagnosed as being in a minimally conscious state to authorise the withdrawal of all life sustaining treatment including nutrition and hydration by artifical means (‘ANH’).” WLR Daily, 28th September 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:30 am by sally
Regina v W [2010] EWCA Crim 372; [2010] WLR (D) 61 “Where the crime of misconduct in a public office was committed in circumstances involving the acquisition of property by theft or fraud, particularly when the holder of a public office was alleged to have made improper claims for public funds in circumstances which were said to be criminal, proof that the defendant was dishonest was an essential ingredient of the offence. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 2:01 am by sally
Regina v H (J); Same v Ferris; Same v W (A); Same v Walker; Same v Dan; Same v S (C); Same v Robertson; Same v P (M) [2011] EWCA Crim 2753; [2012] WLR (D) 12 “In principle, in historic or cold cases, a defendant had to be sentenced in accordance with the sentencing regime applicable at the date of sentence. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 10:17 am by Staff
REDUCED to Misdemeanor DUI – Vehicular Aggravated Assault, State v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 10:31 am by Cara Horowitz
Download as PDF The post Some quick reactions to W Va v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 1:19 am
R v W Stevenson & Sons (A Partnership) [2008] EWCA Crim 273; WLR (D) 60 “Legislation could render a partnership criminally liable as a separate entity from its individual partners. [read post]